The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
ReviewsFull Access

Caring for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder: What Clinicians Should Know About Comorbid Medical Conditions

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing problem, with opioid-involved overdose deaths quadrupling since 1999 in the United States. This article reviews comorbid medical conditions related to OUD, starting with complications of behaviors associated with opioid use (e.g., injection drug use), followed by conditions stemming from the direct effects of opioids (e.g., hypogonadism). HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are common infections in people with OUD, and treatment for these conditions can be safely provided regardless of ongoing substance use. Complications of drug injection, such as HIV, HCV, skin and soft tissue infections, and infective endocarditis, may be prevented through provision of sterile syringes and supervised injection facilities. Rare, life-threatening bacterial infections may present with signs and symptoms that mimic intoxication, such as malaise or stupor, and should be assessed in patients with fever or positive blood cultures. In addition, chronic opioid exposure can lead to hypogonadism, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, sleep-disordered breathing, and potentially increased risk of cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive impairment. Pharmacotherapies for OUD (buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone) are safe and effective and their adverse opioid effects can be managed in clinical practice. Awareness of OUD-associated medical conditions and their treatments is an important step in improving the health and wellness of people with OUD.

Publisher’s Note: This article is part of a special issue titled “The Opioid Crisis: Filling in the Picture.”

Opioid-involved overdose deaths in the United States have more than quadrupled since 1999 in three interrelated waves: first, deaths involving prescription opioids increased; next, heroin-related deaths increased; and then after 2014, mortality related to illicit synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl) skyrocketed (1). Preventing opioid overdose is a priority; however, as opioid use and opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased, understanding and managing medical conditions associated with OUD have become critical too.

The DSM-5 gives 11 criteria for OUD, two or more of which must be met for a diagnosis of OUD. These criteria emphasize continuous and compulsive opioid use leading to negative social, occupational, psychological, and physical consequences, including comorbid medical conditions (2). Among the at least 2.1 million individuals with OUD in the United States, much variability exists in demographic characteristics, method of opioid use, and attendant risks (3); data representing the entire population are limited. During the current opioid crisis, HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreaks have garnered national attention, while other comorbid conditions, such as tobacco-related illnesses, remain under recognized and undertreated in this population (47). In this review, conducted by searching PubMed and relevant clinical guidelines, we present the epidemiology, clinical course, and recommended screening, treatments, and preventive interventions for the most severe and frequently occurring comorbid medical conditions of OUD.

Common OUD-associated medical conditions may result from behaviors (e.g., injection drug use) related to opioid use or from the direct pharmacologic effects of opioids (e.g., hypogonadism). This distinction is important, because it highlights that much of the harm of illicit opioid use comes from unsafe injection practices, which could be addressed through harm reduction interventions, such as distributing sterile syringes or encouraging less risky routes of opioid administration. Additionally, some direct opioid effects can cause harm whether the use is illicit or prescribed, and these harms can be detected and managed with careful clinical monitoring. Thus, this review provides information that will be useful for both clinical care and policy development.

OUD-associated behaviors that can lead to medical complications include mode of opioid administration (injecting, sniffing, smoking), comorbid substance use disorders, and sexual risk behaviors. Behaviors associated with OUD also may have social consequences, such as incarceration or homelessness, which affect comorbid medical conditions and access to care. In-depth discussion of these social consequences, however, is beyond the scope of this review.

Complications of Injection Behaviors

Injection drug use (IDU) causes common and serious OUD complications. Injection can be a private or communal behavior, and the process of preparing and injecting drugs presents several distinct risks. Commonly injected opioids include heroin, which comes as a white powder, darker brown powder, or a sticky black tar variety; illicit synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl or similar analogs; and crushed or dissolved prescription opioids, such as oxycodone or oxymorphone. Powdered opioids and other illicit substances may be cut with readily available adulterants (8). Adulterants that dilute the effects of opioids, such as caffeine, quinine, and sugar, may have health consequences when injected (8). Adulterants that increase opioid effects, such as fentanyl, have been implicated in the recent overdose increases (9). Syringes, cookers, water, and filters used in preparing opioids for injection also may be involved in infectious disease transmission, particularly when shared or reused or if nonsterile (10).

People who inject drugs may prefer injecting into a vein (mainlining), muscle (muscling), or subcutaneous or intradermal tissue (skin-popping) (11). Each site of injection carries different risks. The relative risk of overdose through opioid injection has been found to be 15.9 times that of other routes of administration (12), and intramuscular or subcutaneous injection has been found to increase risk of soft tissue infection (11, 12). Parenteral injection may introduce bacteria beneath the skin and into the bloodstream from contaminated injection supplies, nonsterile water, or unsterilized skin (13).

Medical complications of IDU include HCV, HIV, and bacterial infection, such as skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) or infective endocarditis (Table 1). Despite increased awareness regarding HIV transmission, access to sterile syringes and injection supplies in some areas, and other prevention efforts, rates of HCV and HIV infection remain higher among people who inject drugs than in the general U.S. population (14). In addition, SSTIs and infective endocarditis are serious complications that are increasingly frequent causes of preventable hospitalizations (13, 14).

Table 1. Select medical conditions comorbid to opioid use disorder, by system and route of administration

Type ofConditions associated withConditions associated withConditions associated with
conditioninjection drug usesmoking/inhalationintranasal insufflation
CardiovascularEndocarditis
CancerHepatocellular carcinoma (caused by Hepatitis C)
Infectious diseaseHepatitis A, B, and C; HIV; soft tissue infections (abscess, cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis); infective endocarditis; septic arthritis; osteomyelitis; brain abscess; pulmonary infections; tuberculosis; tetanusHepatitis A, B, C; pulmonary infections; tuberculosisHepatitis A, B, C; pulmonary infections; tuberculosis
NeurologicProgressive spongiform leukoencephalopathy
RespiratoryPneumonia, septic pulmonary embolism, talc granulomatosis, emphysema, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary edema, pneumothoraxAsthma exacerbation, emphysema, pulmonary edema, pneumothoraxAsthma exacerbation, sinus problems, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, nasal septum necrosis or perforation
RenalFocal glomerular sclerosis, glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome, chronic kidney disease

Adapted with permission from Ries RK, Fiellin DA, Miller SC, Saitz R (eds): The ASAM Principles of Addiction Medicine, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2014, Table 72-1

Table 1. Select medical conditions comorbid to opioid use disorder, by system and route of administration

Enlarge table

HCV

Epidemiology.

In the United States, approximately 5 million people are living with HCV, making it the most common bloodborne infection (15). IDU accounts for at least 60% of acute HCV infections (5, 14, 16). Since 2004, acute HCV cases have increased nationally, with the largest increases occurring east of the Mississippi and in central Appalachia among individuals younger than age 30 (5). HCV is highly infectious through blood exposure. Within five years of IDU initiation, more than one in five people become infected with HCV (17).

Clinical course.

Acute HCV infection is usually asymptomatic, but patients may develop flu-like symptoms, myalgias, or dark urine (17). Of those acutely infected, two-thirds develop chronic HCV infection, which increases risk of long-term sequelae, including hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (18). Symptoms of chronic infection can include fatigue, arthralgias, and sicca syndrome. Chronic HCV also is associated with chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, porphyria cutanea tarda, hypothyroidism, and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (17). Patients with chronic HCV have a lifespan that is on average two decades shorter than those without chronic hepatitis (19). Highly effective medications are available, yet deaths attributable to HCV continue to rise, making HCV the most fatal infectious disease in the United States (20).

Screening.

HCV complications may not develop for decades, underscoring the importance of HCV awareness, prevention, and screening. Guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend that all people who inject drugs be offered HCV testing annually (16). People using intranasal drugs also should be offered periodic HCV testing, because sharing contaminated implements for nasal inhalation can transmit HCV (16). Point-of-care testing with oral swab and finger stick are available and could be implemented in substance use disorder treatment and mental health settings (21, 22).

Treatment.

New direct-acting antiviral therapies for HCV have high cure rates (>90% in many populations) and are better tolerated than older treatments, such as interferon. Referral for treatment should happen at the time of diagnosis (18). Typically, evaluation involves determining HCV genotype, viral load, hepatic function, amount of fibrosis, and the patient’s psychosocial readiness for treatment (16). A fibrosis score can now be determined with noninvasive testing; however, liver biopsy may be necessary in some cases. Guideline-recommended treatments vary based on HCV genotype, presence of cirrhosis, and prior treatment history; common regimens are one pill daily for as few as 8–12 weeks (16) (see Table 2 for key resources and guidelines).

Table 2. Key resources and guidelines for care of patients with opioid use disorder and comorbid medical conditions

ResourceOrganizationURL
Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic PainCenters for Disease Control and Preventionhttps://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribing/guideline.html
HCV Guidance: Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis CAmerican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of Americawww.hcvguidelines.org
HIV/AIDSU.S. Department of Health and Human Servicesaidsinfo.nih.gov
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) GuidelinesCenters for Disease Control and Preventionwww.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/prep
Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment GuidelinesCenters for Disease Control and Preventionwww.cdc.gov/std/treatment/default.htm
Syringe ExchangeNorth American Syringe Exchange Networkhttp://nasen.org

Table 2. Key resources and guidelines for care of patients with opioid use disorder and comorbid medical conditions

Enlarge table

Clinical trial data demonstrate that patients infected with HCV and receiving OUD treatment can achieve high HCV cure rates regardless of ongoing drug use (23). Therefore, patients with OUD should not be excluded from HCV treatment or clinical trials (15). Although ongoing IDU increases risk for reinfection, treating people who are at high risk of transmitting HCV infection to others—treatment as prevention—could prevent new HCV infections (24).

HIV

Epidemiology.

By the end of 2013, 1.1 million people were living with HIV/AIDS, and IDU was the mode of transmission for 103,000 men and 68,000 women in the United States (25). From 2010 to 2014, IDU accounted for 11% of new HIV infections among men and 23% of new HIV infections among women (25). Although HIV incidence among people who inject drugs is below the peak rates of the early 1980s, increasing IDU caused by the current opioid crisis puts at least 220 U.S. counties at high risk for HIV outbreaks (26). People younger than age 30 who inject drugs are at highest risk for HIV infection because they are more likely than their older counterparts to share injection equipment and to participate in high-risk sexual behavior (27).

Clinical course.

HIV infection can be categorized as asymptomatic, symptomatic, or AIDS, based on symptoms and CD4+ T-lymphocyte concentration (CD4 count) (28). Signs and symptoms of acute infection commonly include fever, fatigue, night sweats, truncal maculopapular rash, headache, lymphadenopathy, pharyngitis, myalgia, arthralgia, weight loss, diarrhea, depression, and oral or genital ulcers (29). These symptoms may last from fewer than 14 days to 10 weeks. Other, less common presentations of acute HIV infection include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated liver function. Signs and symptoms of acute HIV infection are commonly missed because of their nonspecific nature. People who inject drugs and others who participate in HIV risk behaviors (e.g., having multiple sexual partners, exchanging sex for money or drugs, engaging in receptive anal intercourse) who present with these symptoms may require HIV testing.

Standard HIV diagnostic testing relies on detection of anti-HIV antibodies, which may not be detectable for up to 15–20 days following infection, even when using the most recently developed assay (30). During this initial period, diagnosis can be made by directly testing for the presence of viral ribonucleic acid (30). After the acute infection, an asymptomatic phase may last for years. As the CD4 count gradually decreases, the immune system weakens, increasing risk for atypical infections, such as oral thrush or shingles, and generalized symptoms, such as persistent diarrhea or fever. AIDS is diagnosed when the CD4 count falls below 200 cells/μL or when an AIDS-defining illness, such as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, esophageal candidiasis, or Kaposi sarcoma, is present.

Screening.

Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommend at least annual HIV screening for people who inject drugs and other people with OUD and elevated HIV risk (31, 32). It is recommended that initial HIV testing be performed with a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved fourth–generation antigen/antibody immunoassay, which detects HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and HIV-1 p24 antigen. A positive fourth–generation assay requires additional antibody immunoassay testing to differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2. When results from these two tests conflict, further testing with an HIV-1 nucleic acid test is recommended (33). However, some sites of care serve people who may not be able to follow up and, therefore, need immediate results. Point-of-care testing or self-testing with oral fluids or dried blood spots may be implemented in substance use disorder treatment programs or sites providing emergency care (34). Fourth-generation point-of-care assays have up to 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity and can provide results within 20 minutes (35). People who are newly diagnosed as having HIV should be linked to medical care and counseling as soon as possible (31).

Treatment.

During the past 25 years, improvements have been made in HIV diagnostic tests, antiretroviral therapy, and patient longevity. Life expectancy for those who start treatment early is nearly equal to that of the general population. Despite medical advances, people who inject drugs, nonwhites, and other marginalized groups have experienced smaller reductions in HIV-related mortality (36). Some clinicians withhold treatment from people who inject drugs because of concerns about incomplete medication adherence; however, decreased pill burden or supportive interventions, such as pillboxes, reminders, or directly observed therapy, can improve adherence (37). Antiretroviral treatment initiation is recommended as soon as possible after diagnosis regardless of CD4 count. This treatment reduces the likelihood of transmission to others and improves long-term health outcomes (32).

HIV treatment guidelines published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services can be found online at aidsinfo.nih.gov (38) (Table 2). Some first- and second-line regimens contain strong CYP3A4 inhibitors but may interact with medications commonly prescribed for other medical or psychiatric diagnoses (38). Some nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (e.g., efavirenz) interact with methadone and often require an increase in methadone to avoid opioid withdrawal symptoms (38). This interaction can be avoided with the newer once-daily tablets (38). Medication lists should be reviewed for potential interactions (38). First-line treatment regimens for HIV infection are listed (Table 3). Adherence to antiretroviral regimens is critical for suppressing viral load and has significantly improved with one-pill-once-daily regimens and decreased pill burden (39).

Table 3. Recommended initial antiretroviral regimens for treatment of HIVa

Antiretroviral regimenNo. of pills
Abacavir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir1
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine + Dolutegravir2
Elvitegravir/cobicistat/Tenofovir/Emtricitabineb1
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine + Raltegravir2
Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir1

aAdapted from aidsinfo.nih.gov (38).

bContains a CYP3A4 inhibitor.

Table 3. Recommended initial antiretroviral regimens for treatment of HIVa

Enlarge table

Prevention.

Many evidence-based HIV prevention interventions exist, including condom distribution, partner notification and agreements, and harm reduction practices (see below). Pharmacologic HIV prevention is also possible with preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using a combination tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine pill taken once daily. PrEP has been shown to prevent HIV infection among people who inject drugs (40). The CDC recommends offering PrEP to adults ages 18 years or older without established HIV infection who have injected any nonprescribed drug in the prior six months and meet one of the following additional criteria: any sharing of injection or drug preparation equipment during the past six months, enrollment in a methadone or buprenorphine treatment program in the past six months, history of anal sex without condom use, history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) during the past six months, ongoing relationship with an HIV-positive partner, or infrequent condom use during sex (41) (Table 2).

SSTIs

Epidemiology.

SSTIs are the most common reason for hospital admission among people who inject drugs (42). Hospitalization for SSTIs among people who inject drugs doubled between 1993 and 2010 (42). Female gender, intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, more frequent injection, using mixtures of heroin and cocaine (speed balls), and using black tar heroin are associated with increased infection risk (43). Injecting crushed prescription opioids also may lead to adverse skin reactions and limb ischemia due to talc or other inactive ingredients in tablets (44).

Clinical course and treatment.

The spectrum of SSTIs and their sequelae includes abscesses, cellulitis, systemic sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, pyomyositis (abscesses of skeletal muscle), abscesses of visceral organs, bone/joint infections, and endovascular infections. Abscesses are the most frequent SSTI among people who inject drugs and present as red, tender fluctuant areas in the skin (45). The most important aspects of abscess care are cleaning the infected area, incision, and drainage (13). Patients with SSTIs may present with nonspecific symptoms, such as fatigue, sweating, or impaired mental status, which could be mistakenly attributed to opioid intoxication or withdrawal rather than to acute infection (13).

Necrotizing fasciitis, a serious SSTI involving deep layers of subcutaneous tissue, has a high incidence among people who inject drugs. Severe pain out of proportion to the skin appearance, rapid spread of skin erythema, or unstable vital signs can be a clue to a more serious infection. Necrotizing fasciitis is a medical emergency and often requires advanced imaging, surgical exploration, debridement of infected skin and muscle, and intravenous antibiotics (13).

Most SSTIs are caused by commensal flora, but contaminated drugs, drug adulterants, or drug use paraphernalia also may introduce bacteria (13). Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus species most frequently cause SSTIs; however, outbreaks of less common organisms, such as Pseudomonas or Clostridium species may occur among people who inject drugs. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is elevated among this population and is of concern because of its virulence and association with more severe infections, such as necrotizing fasciitis (46). Documented outbreaks from lethal Clostridium species associated with black tar heroin have been associated with wound botulism, tetanus, and necrotizing fasciitis (13). Botulism is uncommon, however, and signs and symptoms, such as difficulty swallowing, slurred speech, blurred vision, and muscle paralysis, may be confused with intoxication.

Endovascular Infections

Epidemiology.

Endovascular infections, including infective endocarditis, septic thrombophlebitis, and mycotic aneurysms, are risks of IDU. Lifetime prevalence of infective endocarditis among people who inject drugs ranges from 0.5% to 12% and is among the most serious infectious complications of IDU (45). Infections at other sites, skin colonization with Staphylococcus aureus, and a history of infective endocarditis increase risk of infective endocarditis in this population (13). HIV infection also predisposes people who inject drugs to infective endocarditis, with a fourfold increase in incidence in those with versus without HIV infection shown in one study (47).

Clinical course and treatment.

Signs and symptoms of endovascular infection include fever, night sweats, joint and muscle pain, and weight loss, or may be more severe, with heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, abscesses of visceral organs, and immune-mediated phenomena. Fever and a new heart murmur should prompt additional investigation via blood cultures and echocardiogram. Endovascular infection should be ruled out in those with bacteremia who inject drugs (13). Treatment consists of antibiotics and sometimes surgery.

Other Bacterial Infections

Pulmonary infections, including pneumonia, tuberculosis (TB), and septic emboli also are common complications of IDU (48). TB is highly transmissible through respiratory droplets, making outbreaks most common in communal settings lacking adequate ventilation. Exposure to TB may occur in jails or homeless shelters, and HIV infection is a risk factor for TB. Pneumonia may occur via hematogenous spread to the lungs. Aspiration pneumonia could be caused by opioid-induced stupor and suppressed cough reflex. Impaired immune defenses from other comorbid conditions also can lead to atypical pneumonias. In addition to illicit IDU, prescribed opioid use has been associated with increased risk of pneumonia (49, 50).

Injecting crushed prescription opioids may introduce other risks. Talc from crushed oxycodone, buprenorphine tablets, or other adulterants may lead to foreign-body granulomatosis of the lung, liver, or other organs. Injected particles lodge in pulmonary capillaries, leading to an immune reaction, and may subsequently cause fibrosis, emphysema, and pulmonary hypertension. Patients present with cough, shortness of breath, and increased sputum production, but chest x-ray may appear normal, making diagnosis difficult (48).

Harm Reduction Practices for IDU

Many comorbid conditions associated with IDU could be prevented through harm reduction practices. Distribution of sterile syringes and other injection supplies through syringe exchange programs reduce reuse and sharing of syringes and thus decrease HIV and HCV transmission and SSTI risk. Researchers have demonstrated that sterile syringe services reduce HIV and HCV transmission without increasing frequency of injection (5153). Resources describing local syringe exchange programs are available through the North American Syringe Exchange Network (Table 2). Where available, supervised injection facilities or safe drug consumption sites provide a space where people can bring drugs to inject more safely (54). Typically, these spaces offer well-lit stalls, sterile injection equipment, and medical supervision supplied to reduce risk of HIV transmission, SSTIs, and overdose (54). Provision of intravenous heroin or another potent opioid in a medical setting has been shown to reduce use of illicit drugs and may reduce mortality (55). Heroin replacement therapy is available in Europe and Canada (56).

Complications of Intranasal Opioid Insufflation

Another common mode of opioid administration is intranasal insufflation (sniffing) of powdered or dissolved opioids. Less of the drug is bioavailable via intranasal administration; therefore, overdose risk is lower than that for injection (57). Intranasal opioid use is a risk factor for HCV infection, but the precise mechanism of HCV transmission is unknown (16). Intranasal insufflation can lead to other comorbid conditions (Table 1), including asthma exacerbation, sinus problems, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or nasal septum necrosis or perforation (58).

Complications of Inhalation of Combusted Smoke

Smoking heroin or other opioids is less common in the United States than in Asia or Western Europe. Powdered heroin may be smoked in cigarettes or heated on foil, so the fumes can be inhaled through a tube (“chasing the dragon”). Although overdose risk appears to be lower with heroin inhalation in comparison to intravenous use (57), respiratory illnesses present serious health risks. Respiratory disease associated with inhalation include asthma exacerbation, pneumothorax, pulmonary edema, and early-onset emphysema (59) (Table 1).

Inhaling opioids also may cause extrapulmonary complications. Inhaling heated heroin vapor has been associated with progressive spongiform leukoencephalopathy, which may injure neurons in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Patients may present with slurred speech, ataxia, tremors, or neurobehavioral symptoms. Although incidence is rare, 25% of reported cases have been fatal. It is unclear whether the toxic insult is from heroin itself or an unknown contaminant (60).

Comorbid Conditions Associated With Co-occurring Behaviors

Concomitant Substance Use Disorders

Many people with OUD have other substance use disorders that can lead to significant medical complications. Among U.S. residents (2011–2013) reporting past-year heroin use and other past-year substance use disorders, more than 33% used alcohol, 25% used cocaine, 25% used cannabis, and nearly 50% used prescription opioids (61). Polysubstance use is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Benzodiazepine use disorder is common among people with OUD and dramatically increases overdose risk (62). Alcohol use disorder is associated with accidents, peptic ulcer disease, liver disease, cancers, and hypertension (48). Alcohol use disorder co-occurring with OUD increases the risk of overdose and should be screened for in patients with known OUD (63). Cocaine use disorder is linked to cardiovascular disease, particularly stroke and myocardial infarction, as well as chronic kidney disease (64). Cannabis use disorder, although often considered more benign, may be associated with accidents, respiratory conditions, and adverse cognitive effects (65). Awareness of medical conditions associated with other substance use disorders is important in the delivery of care for OUD patients.

Tobacco-related illnesses also disproportionately affect people with OUD. Cohort studies suggest that half of people with a substance use disorder die from tobacco-related illnesses, and the death rate of smokers is four times greater than that of nonsmokers over long periods of follow-up (66). Prevalence of tobacco use may be as high as 93% among patients in methadone maintenance treatment programs (67). Chronic medical conditions stemming from tobacco use, such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, and cancer, are leading causes of death among people with OUD (68). Patients receiving OUD treatment seldom receive evidence-based smoking cessation interventions despite the high burden of tobacco-related illness. Nicotine replacement therapy and varenicline are effective treatments for tobacco use disorder among patients maintained on methadone (69, 70). Implementing systematic interventions at OUD treatment programs to increase access to smoking cessation treatments should be a high priority.

Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)

People who use drugs have higher STI rates than the general population (14). Intoxication may influence decisions regarding sexual activity, including condom use, which may lead to gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, chlamydia, HIV, or other STI exposure. Additionally, people who exchange sex for money or drugs are at risk for STIs, and they may be exposed to threatening situations where they are unable to control sexual risk behaviors (71).

Comorbid Conditions Due to the Direct Effects of Opioids

By any route of administration, opioids may result in adverse health effects. Opioids cause respiratory depression and can lead to unintended overdose. Opioid receptors are ubiquitous throughout the body; therefore, chronic opioid exposure may have other effects, such as hypogonadism, worsening pain, sleep-disordered breathing, cardiovascular disease, and neurotoxicity. The direct effects occur whether opioids are prescribed or taken illicitly, but these effects usually do not limit OUD treatment. The opioid agonist treatments buprenorphine and methadone are safe and effective, and fear of side effects should not prevent eligible patients from starting possibly life-saving treatment. Overdose risk is lower with buprenorphine than with other opioids. Buprenorphine has only partial agonist activity at the mu-opioid receptor, and high doses typically do not lead to life-threating respiratory depression (e.g., the ceiling effect). The opioid antagonist treatment naltrexone does not exert direct opioid effects, but advantages and disadvantages of this treatment option compared to opioid agonist treatments are beyond the scope of this review.

Unintended Overdose

The risk of unintended opioid overdose increases with co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions. Opioids have a dose-dependent effect on respiratory depression. Patients with OUD often have chronic pain, anxiety, and other mood disorders, for which they may be prescribed sedating medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, sleep aids) that further exacerbate respiratory depression (72, 73). Most notably, concurrent use of benzodiazepines and opioids is a major risk factor for overdose (74, 75). The cumulative effects of multiple sedating medications with opioid use increase overdose risk (73). Chronic liver and/or pulmonary disease, which may impair opioid metabolism and pulmonary reserves, may worsen opioids’ respiratory depression effects (76).

Evidence-based strategies can reduce unintended overdose among patients taking illicit or prescribed opioids. Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine or methadone for patients with OUD is associated with large reductions in overdose mortality (77, 78). The CDC guidelines on prescribing opioids for chronic pain recommend strategies for reducing overdose risk for patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy (76). Clinicians can provide overdose prevention education and prescribe naloxone, an opioid antagonist used to temporarily reverse overdose (76).

Chronic Pain

A complex, bidirectional relationship exists between opioid use and chronic pain. Approximately 40% of patients in methadone maintenance programs have chronic pain (79). People with OUD frequently have chronic pain for several reasons: chronic pain may have preceded OUD or stem from conditions associated with OUD, such as HIV or HCV; accidents and trauma may occur because of OUD; and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may occur secondary to chronic opioid exposure. The risk for developing OUD among patients who start prescription opioids for chronic pain is likely small but significant (80). Among patients with OUD taking prescription opioids, pain is a leading motivation for use (81). Opioid use is also associated with increased risk of accidents and trauma (82), which can lead to chronic pain. Lastly, opioids can induce hyperalgesia, in which pain sensitization is enhanced despite opioid therapy. The prevalence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia is unknown, and no standardized criteria for diagnosis exist (83, 84). However, in contrast to pain from injuries, opioid withdrawal, or physiologic tolerance, pain symptoms from opioid-induced hyperalgesia paradoxically improve when the opioid dosage is reduced.

Chronic pain can be difficult to treat in people with OUD. Comprehensive multimodal approaches should be used, including OUD treatment; nonopioid analgesics; nonpharmacologic treatments, such as physical therapy and acupuncture; and other psychosocial treatments directed at pain and comorbid mental health conditions (85). Multidisciplinary treatment teams with pain, addiction, and mental health specialists are likely best equipped to care for patients with OUD and chronic pain (86).

Hypogonadism

Clinically significant endocrine dysfunction due to hypogonadism occurs in an estimated 9%-29% of patients (87) who use chronic opioids (88). Opioids directly suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and -adrenal axes, subsequently reducing production of estrogen, testosterone, and other sex hormones (89). Patients may experience decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, irregular or absent menses, infertility, anxiety, depression, and fatigue (90). Chronic opioid use is associated with low bone density, likely due to hypogonadism, leading to increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures (90, 91). No consensus exists for the management of opioid-induced hypogonadism, but options include hormone supplementation with testosterone or estrogen, opioid rotation, and opioid reduction or discontinuation (92). No clear recommendations have been developed for screening, prevention, or management of opioid-associated osteoporosis (93).

Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Sleep-disordered breathing occurs in as many as 70%–85% of people who use opioids (94). Central sleep apnea is the most common type of sleep-disordered breathing associated with opioid use, likely because opioids depress hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory drives. Obstructive sleep apnea also may be worsened by opioid-induced suppression in airway muscle activity (95). Sleep-disordered breathing adversely affects daytime alertness and cognition and may increase long-term risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Reducing the opioid dosage may improve sleep-disordered breathing, although such a reduction may not be indicated for patients receiving opioid agonists for OUD. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation is an effective treatment for sleep-disordered breathing (96).

Other Potential Toxicities

Chronic opioid use is associated in some cohort studies with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, including myocardial infarction and stroke (96, 97). The mechanism of increased risk is likely multifactorial, including co-occurring risk factors, such as tobacco use, and possibly direct opioid effects. In addition, methadone can alter electrical conduction within the cardiac tissue, as evidenced by QTc prolongation on electrocardiogram that can lead to fatal arrhythmias. Recommendations for cardiac screening prior to methadone treatment initiation include taking a history of personal or familial heart disease, assessing cardiac risk factors and use of QTc-prolonging drugs, and performing an electrocardiogram for some patients (98, 99). Opioids also may affect cognitive function. Chronic opioid use has been associated with deficits in working memory, planning, impulse control, and decision making (100).

OUD Treatment and Comorbid Medical Conditions

Initiation of OUD treatment is an opportunity to screen for and identify comorbid medical conditions that may have gone unrecognized and untreated. The FDA has approved three medications for OUD (methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone), which may be offered concomitantly with care for other medical conditions. In the U.S., methadone maintenance treatment is only available in regulated opioid treatment programs. Although some studies have demonstrated improved HIV treatment outcomes with concomitant methadone maintenance for OUD, some patients continue to have difficulty with adherence to antiretroviral therapy and need more intensive interventions (e.g., directly observed therapy in which methadone and antiretroviral medications are administered simultaneously) (101103). Buprenorphine maintenance treatment has been successfully integrated into primary care and HIV treatment settings (104) and buprenorphine treatment is associated with HIV viral load suppression, improved HCV outcomes, and identification and management of other chronic medical conditions (105107). Fewer studies have evaluated naltrexone and management of co-occurring medical conditions (108). Use of naltrexone has been evaluated in a pilot study of people living with HIV/AIDS who use opioids and alcohol, but the small sample size limited evaluation of HIV outcomes (11).

Conclusions

Clinicians who care for people with OUD should be aware of acute and chronic infectious diseases (e.g., HIV, HCV, SSTI, and infective endocarditis) and chronic noninfectious conditions (e.g., sleep-disordered breathing and hypogonadism) that are associated with opioid use. Episodes of acute medical care, such as hospitalization for overdose or infective endocarditis, provide opportunities to diagnose and initiate treatment for OUD and associated medical conditions. Likewise, initiating OUD treatment offers the opportunity to better manage comorbid conditions or provide preventive care. In both settings, people who use drugs need patient-centered care that maintains their dignity and reduces shame. Substance use disorders are highly stigmatized in the United States, and stigma may prevent people with OUD from seeking medical care. Therefore, communications that use person-first language (e.g., people who use drugs) and avoid stigmatizing slang (e.g., addict or drug seeker) are essential components of care. Although many common OUD-associated comorbid conditions may be prevented through harm reduction practices, integration of medical and OUD treatment may improve health outcomes by furthering access to appropriate medical care for people with OUD. Awareness of OUD-associated medical conditions and their treatments is an important step in improving the health and wellness of people with OUD.

Key Points

  • HIV and HCV infection are common in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD).

  • Successful treatments for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be provided to patients with OUD, regardless of ongoing substance use.

  • Complications of injection drug use, such as HIV, HCV, skin and soft tissue infections, and infective endocarditis, could be prevented with harm reduction practices (e.g., sterile syringe services and supervised injection facilities).

  • Rare, life-threatening bacterial infections may present with signs and symptoms that mimic intoxication, such as malaise or stupor, and should be thoroughly assessed in patients with fever or positive blood cultures.

  • Chronic opioid exposure can lead to hypogonadism, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, sleep-disordered breathing, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive impairment.

  • Medications for OUD—buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone—are safe and effective, and awareness of adverse opioid effects can improve clinical practice.

Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Send correspondence to Dr. Slawek ().

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Aaron D. Fox received funding for this work from the National Institutes of Health, grant K23DA034541.

References

1 Annual Surveillance Report of Drug-Related Risks and Outcomes—United States. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2017-cdc-drug-surveillance-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

2 American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2013CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3 Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results From the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, HHS Pub no SMA 18-5068, NSDUH Series H-53. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2018. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/Google Scholar

4 Peters PJ, Pontones P, Hoover KW, et al.: HIV infection linked to injection use of oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014–2015. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:229–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar

5 Zibbell JE, Iqbal K, Patel RC, et al.: Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged ≤30 years—Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:453–458Google Scholar

6 Mehta SH, Genberg BL, Astemborski J, et al.: Limited uptake of hepatitis C treatment among injection drug users. J Community Health 2008; 33:126–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7 Grebely J, Raffa JD, Lai C, et al.: Low uptake of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection in a large community-based study of inner city residents. J Viral Hepat 2009; 16:352–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar

8 Cole C, Jones L, McVeigh J, et al.: Adulterants in illicit drugs: a review of empirical evidence. Drug Test Anal 2011; 3:89–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar

9 Prekupec MP, Mansky PA, Baumann MH: Misuse of novel synthetic opioids: a deadly new trend. J Addict Med 2017; 11:256–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10 Smith DK, Pan Y, Rose CE, et al.: A brief screening tool to assess the risk of contracting HIV infection among active injection drug users. J Addict Med 2015; 9:226–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11 Binswanger IA, Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, et al.: High prevalence of abscesses and cellulitis among community-recruited injection drug users in San Francisco. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:579–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar

12 Brugal MT, Barrio G, De LF, et al.: Factors associated with non-fatal heroin overdose: assessing the effect of frequency and route of heroin administration. Addiction 2002; 97:319–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar

13 Gordon RJ, Lowy FD: Bacterial infections in drug users. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1945–1954CrossrefGoogle Scholar

14 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Integrated prevention services for HIV infection, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis for persons who use drugs illicitly: summary guidance from CDC and the US Department of Health and Human Services. MMWR Recomm Rep 2012; 61(RR-5):1–40Google Scholar

15 Chak E, Talal AH, Sherman KE, et al.: Hepatitis C virus infection in USA: an estimate of true prevalence. Liver Int 2011; 31:1090–1101CrossrefGoogle Scholar

16 The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): HCV Guidance: Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C. Danvers, MA, AASLD-IDSA, 2017. https://www.hcvguidelines.orgGoogle Scholar

17 Amon JJ, Garfein RS, Ahdieh-Grant L, et al.: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users in the United States, 1994–2004. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1852–1858CrossrefGoogle Scholar

18 Kim A: Hepatitis C: virus. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165:ITC33–ITC48CrossrefGoogle Scholar

19 Ly KN, Xing J, Klevens RM, et al.: Causes of death and characteristics of decedents with viral hepatitis, United States, 2010. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:40–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar

20 Ly KN, Hughes EM, Jiles RB, et al.: Rising mortality associated with hepatitis C virus in the United States, 2003–2013. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:1287–1288CrossrefGoogle Scholar

21 Parisi MR, Tecco S, Gastaldi G, et al.: Point-of-care testing for hepatitis C virus infection at alternative and high-risk sites: an Italian pilot study in a dental clinic. New Microbiol 2017; 40:242–245Google Scholar

22 Stockman LJ, Guilfoye SM, Benoit AL, et al.: Rapid hepatitis C testing among persons at increased risk for infection—Wisconsin, 2012–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:309–311Google Scholar

23 Dore GJ, Altice F, Litwin AH, et al.: Elbasvir-Grazoprevir to treat hepatitis C virus infection in persons receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165:625–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar

24 Martin NK, Vickerman P, Dore GJ, et al.: The hepatitis C virus epidemics in key populations (including people who inject drugs, prisoners and MSM): the use of direct-acting antivirals as treatment for prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2015; 10:374–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar

25 HIV Surveillance Report. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2016-vol-28.pdfGoogle Scholar

26 Van Handel MM, Rose CE, Hallisey EJ, et al.: County-level vulnerability assessment for rapid dissemination of HIV or HCV infections among persons who inject drugs, United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 73:323–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar

27 HIV and Injection Drug Use. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/cdc-hiv-idu-fact-sheet.pdfGoogle Scholar

28 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992; 41:1–19Google Scholar

29 Kahn JO, Walker BD: Acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:33–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar

30 Branson BM, Stekler JD: Detection of acute HIV infection: we can’t close the window. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:521–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar

31 Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al.: Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1–17Google Scholar

32 Feinberg J, Keeshin S: Management of newly diagnosed HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167:ITC1–ITC16CrossrefGoogle Scholar

33 Laboratory Testing for the Diagnosis of HIV Infection: Updated Recommendations. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, 2014.http://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc.23447Google Scholar

34 Figueroa C, Johnson C, Ford N, et al.: Reliability of HIV rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing compared with testing by health-care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV 2018; 5:e277–e290CrossrefGoogle Scholar

35 Stafylis C, Klausner JD: Evaluation of two 4th generation point-of-care assays for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus infection. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183944CrossrefGoogle Scholar

36 Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration: Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV 2017; 4:e349–e356CrossrefGoogle Scholar

37 Malta M, Monteiro S, Lima RM, et al.: HIV/AIDS risk among female sex workers who use crack in Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2008; 42:830–837CrossrefGoogle Scholar

38 Panel on Antiretroviral Guideline for Adults and Adolescents: Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Bethesda, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelinesGoogle Scholar

39 Nachega JB, Parienti JJ, Uthman OA, et al.: Lower pill burden and once-daily antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:1297–1307CrossrefGoogle Scholar

40 Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al.: Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013; 381:2083–2090CrossrefGoogle Scholar

41 Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the United States—2017 Update: A Clinical Practice Guideline. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar

42 Ciccarone D, Unick GJ, Cohen JK, et al.: Nationwide increase in hospitalizations for heroin-related soft tissue infections: associations with structural market conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 163:126–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43 Smith ME, Robinowitz N, Chaulk P, et al.: High rates of abscesses and chronic wounds in community-recruited injection drug users and associated risk factors. J Addict Med 2015; 9:87–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar

44 Partanen TA, Vikatmaa P, Tukiainen E, et al.: Outcome after injections of crushed tablets in intravenous drug abusers in the Helsinki University Central Hospital. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37:704–711CrossrefGoogle Scholar

45 Larney S, Peacock A, Mathers BM, et al.: A systematic review of injecting-related injury and disease among people who inject drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 171:39–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar

46 Lloyd-Smith E, Hull MW, Tyndall MW, et al.: Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is prevalent in wounds of community-based injection drug users. Epidemiol Infect 2010; 138:713–720CrossrefGoogle Scholar

47 Wilson LE, Thomas DL, Astemborski J, et al.: Prospective study of infective endocarditis among injection drug users. J Infect Dis 2002; 185:1761–1766CrossrefGoogle Scholar

48 Heavner JJ, Saukkonen JJ, Akgun KM: Respiratory tract disorders related to alcohol and other drug use; in Principles of Addiction Medicine, 5th ed. Edited by Ries RK, Fiellin DA, Miller SC, Saitz R. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer, 2014Google Scholar

49 Jenness SM, Goodreau SM, Rosenberg E, et al.: Impact of the Centers for Disease Control’s HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Guidelines for Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. J Infect Dis 2016; 214:1800–1807CrossrefGoogle Scholar

50 Wiese AD, Griffin MR, Schaffner W, et al.: Opioid analgesic use and risk for invasive pneumococcal diseases: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168:396–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar

51 Turner KM, Hutchinson S, Vickerman P, et al.: The impact of needle and syringe provision and opiate substitution therapy on the incidence of hepatitis C virus in injecting drug users: pooling of UK evidence. Addiction 2011; 106:1978–1988CrossrefGoogle Scholar

52 Fernandes RM, Cary M, Duarte G, et al.: Effectiveness of needle and syringe programmes in people who inject drugs—an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:309CrossrefGoogle Scholar

53 Fisher DG, Fenaughty AM, Cagle HH, et al.: Needle exchange and injection drug use frequency: a randomized clinical trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 33:199–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar

54 Potier C, Laprévote V, Dubois-Arber F, et al.: Supervised injection services: what has been demonstrated? A systematic literature review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014; 145:48–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar

55 Ferri M, Davoli M, Perucci CA: Heroin maintenance for chronic heroin-dependent individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 12:CD003410Google Scholar

56 Demaret I, Quertemont E, Litran G, et al.: Loss of treatment benefit when heroin-assisted treatment is stopped after 12 months. J Subst Abuse Treat 2016; 69:72–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar

57 Gossop M, Griffiths P, Powis B, et al.: Frequency of non-fatal heroin overdose: survey of heroin users recruited in non-clinical settings. BMJ 1996; 313:402CrossrefGoogle Scholar

58 Peyrière H, Léglise Y, Rousseau A, et al.: Necrosis of the intranasal structures and soft palate as a result of heroin snorting: a case series. Subst Abus 2013; 34:409–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar

59 Tashkin DP: Airway effects of marijuana, cocaine, and other inhaled illicit agents. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2001; 7:43–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar

60 Kriegstein AR, Armitage BA, Kim PY: Heroin inhalation and progressive spongiform leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:589–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar

61 Jones CMLJ, Logan J, Gladden RM, et al.: Vital signs: demographic and substance use trends among heroin users—United States, 2002–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:719–725Google Scholar

62 Jones JD, Mogali S, Comer SD: Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 125:8–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar

63 Saunders K, Von Korff M, Campbell CI, et al.: Concurrent use of alcohol and sedatives among persons prescribed chronic opioid therapy: prevalence and risk factors. J Pain 2012; 13: 266–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar

64 Riezzo I, Fiore C, De Carlo D, et al.: Side effects of cocaine abuse: multiorgan toxicity and pathologic consequences. Curr Med Chem 2012; 19:5624–5646CrossrefGoogle Scholar

65 Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, et al.: Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2219–2227CrossrefGoogle Scholar

66 Hser YI, McCarthy WJ, Anglin MD: Tobacco use as a distal predictor of mortality among long-term narcotics addicts. Prev Med 1994; 23:61–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar

67 Nahvi S, Richter K, Li X, et al.: Cigarette smoking and interest in quitting in methadone maintenance patients. Addict Behav 2006; 31:2127–2134CrossrefGoogle Scholar

68 Hser YI, Mooney LJ, Saxon AJ, et al.: High mortality among patients with opioid use disorder in a large healthcare system. J Addict Med 2017; 11:315–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar

69 Yee A, Hoong MC, Joyce YC, et al.: Smoking cessation among methadone-maintained patients: a meta-analysis. Subst Use Misuse 2018; 53:276–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar

70 Nahvi S, Ning Y, Segal KS, et al.: Varenicline efficacy and safety among methadone maintained smokers: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction 2014; 109:1554–1563CrossrefGoogle Scholar

71 Workowski KA, Bolan GA: Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64(RR-03):1–137Google Scholar

72 Barry DT, Cutter CJ, Beitel M, et al.: Psychiatric disorders among patients seeking treatment for co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2016; 77:1413–1419CrossrefGoogle Scholar

73 Olfson M, Wall M, Wang S, et al.: Service use preceding opioid-related fatality. Am J Psychiatry 2018; 175:538–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar

74 Hwang CS, Kang EM, Kornegay CJ, et al.: Trends in the concomitant prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines, 2002–2014. Am J Prev Med 2016; 51:151–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar

75 Jones CM, McAninch JK: Emergency department visits and overdose deaths from combined use of opioids and benzodiazepines. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49:493–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar

76 Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R: CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016; 65:1–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar

77 Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, et al.: Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ 2017; 357:j1550CrossrefGoogle Scholar

78 Larochelle MR, Bernson D, Land T, et al.: Medication for opioid use disorder after nonfatal opioid overdose and association with mortality: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169:137–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar

79 Rosenblum A, Joseph H, Fong C, et al.: Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain among chemically dependent patients in methadone maintenance and residential treatment facilities. JAMA 2003; 289:2370–2378CrossrefGoogle Scholar

80 Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Russo JE, et al.: The role of opioid prescription in incident opioid abuse and dependence among individuals with chronic noncancer pain: the role of opioid prescription. Clin J Pain 2014; 30:557–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar

81 Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, et al.: Prescription opioid use, misuse, and use disorders in U.S. adults: 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167:293–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar

82 Gomes T, Redelmeier DA, Juurlink DN, et al.: Opioid dose and risk of road trauma in Canada: a population-based study. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:196–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar

83 Lee M, Silverman SM, Hansen H, et al.: A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician 2011; 14:145–161Google Scholar

84 Yi P, Pryzbylkowski P: Opioid induced hyperalgesia. Pain Med 2015; 16(Suppl 1):S32–S36CrossrefGoogle Scholar

85 Liebschutz J, Beers D, Lange A: Managing chronic pain in patients with opioid dependence. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 2014; 1:204–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar

86 Becker WC, Edmond SN, Cervone DJ, et al.: Evaluation of an integrated, multidisciplinary program to address unsafe use of opioids prescribed for pain. Pain Med 2018; 19:1419–1424CrossrefGoogle Scholar

87 Donegan D, Bancos I: Opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency. Mayo Clin Proc 2018; 93:937–944CrossrefGoogle Scholar

88 Katz N, Mazer NA: The impact of opioids on the endocrine system. Clin J Pain 2009; 25:170–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar

89 Brennan MJ: The effect of opioid therapy on endocrine function. Am J Med 2013; 126(Suppl 1):S12–S18CrossrefGoogle Scholar

90 Jackson JA, Riggs MW, Spiekerman AM: Testosterone deficiency as a risk factor for hip fractures in men: a case-control study. Am J Med Sci 1992; 304:4–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

91 Kim TW, Alford DP, Malabanan A, et al.: Low bone density in patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 85:258–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar

92 Harris JD: Management of expected and unexpected opioid-related side effects. Clin J Pain 2008; 24(Suppl 10):S8–S13CrossrefGoogle Scholar

93 O’Rourke TK Jr, Wosnitzer MS: Opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD): diagnosis, management, and literature review. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17:76CrossrefGoogle Scholar

94 Van Ryswyk E, Antic NA: Opioids and sleep-disordered breathing. Chest 2016; 150:934–944CrossrefGoogle Scholar

95 Hajiha M, DuBord MA, Liu H, et al.: Opioid receptor mechanisms at the hypoglossal motor pool and effects on tongue muscle activity in vivo. J Physiol 2009; 587:2677–2692CrossrefGoogle Scholar

96 Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, et al.: Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic noncancer pain. JAMA 2016; 315:2415–2423CrossrefGoogle Scholar

97 Li L, Setoguchi S, Cabral H, et al.: Opioid use for noncancer pain and risk of myocardial infarction amongst adults. J Intern Med 2013; 273:511–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar

98 Chou R, Cruciani RA, Fiellin DA, et al.: Methadone safety: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society. J Pain 2014; 15:321–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar

99 Martin JA, Campbell A, Killip T, et al.: QT interval screening in methadone maintenance treatment: report of a SAMHSA expert panel. J Addict Dis 2011; 30:283–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar

100 Loeber S, Nakovics H, Kniest A, et al.: Factors affecting cognitive function of opiate-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 120:81–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar

101 Shrestha R, Copenhaver MM: Viral suppression among HIV-infected methadone-maintained patients: the role of ongoing injection drug use and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Addict Behav 2018; 85:88–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar

102 Karki P, Shrestha R, Huedo-Medina TB, et al.: The impact of methadone maintenance treatment on HIV risk behaviors among high-risk injection drug users: a systematic review. Evid Based Med Public Health 2016; 2:2Google Scholar

103 Low AJ, Mburu G, Welton NJ, et al.: Impact of opioid substitution therapy on antiretroviral therapy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1094–1104CrossrefGoogle Scholar

104 Weiss L, Netherland J, Egan JE, et al.: Integration of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment into HIV clinical care: lessons from the BHIVES collaborative. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56(Suppl 1):S68–S75CrossrefGoogle Scholar

105 Altice FL, Bruce RD, Lucas GM, et al.: HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment within HIV clinical care settings: results from a multisite study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56(Suppl 1):S22–S32CrossrefGoogle Scholar

106 Norton BL, Beitin A, Glenn M, et al.: Retention in buprenorphine treatment is associated with improved HCV care outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat 2017; 75:38–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar

107 Rowe TA, Jacapraro JS, Rastegar DA: Entry into primary care-based buprenorphine treatment is associated with identification and treatment of other chronic medical problems. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2012; 7:22CrossrefGoogle Scholar

108 Korthuis PT, Lum PJ, Vergara-Rodriguez P, et al.: Feasibility and safety of extended-release naltrexone treatment of opioid and alcohol use disorder in HIV clinics: a pilot/feasibility randomized trial. Addiction 2017; 112:1036–1044CrossrefGoogle Scholar